\documentclass[presentation]{beamer}
%\documentclass[presentation,aspectratio=169]{beamer}
% Replacing 'presentation' with 'handout' in the above line
% will produce 4 slides per page.
% The hyperref option makes it possible to include hyperlinks.

\mode<presentation> {
    \usetheme{Boadilla}
    \setbeamercovered{transparent}
}

\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
%\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\mode<handout>{
    \usepackage{pgfpages}
    \pgfpagesuselayout{4 on 1}[letterpaper,landscape,border shrink=5mm]
\setbeamercolor{background canvas}{bg=black!10} }

\setbeamertemplate{footline}
{
    \leavevmode%
    \hbox{%
        \begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.333333\paperwidth,ht=2.25ex,dp=1ex,center]{author
            in head/foot}%
            \usebeamerfont{author in head/ foot}\insertshortauthor%&\approx& (\insertshorti
        \end{beamercolorbox}%
        \begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.333333\paperwidth,ht=2.25ex,dp=1ex,center]{title
            in head/foot}%
            \usebeamerfont{title in head/foot}\insertshorttitle
        \end{beamercolorbox}%
        \begin{beamercolorbox}[wd=.333333\paperwidth,ht=2.25ex,dp=1ex,right]{date in
            head/foot}%
            \usebeamerfont{date in head/foot}\insertshortdate\hspace*{2em}
            \insertframenumber / \inserttotalframenumber\hspace*{2ex}
    \end{beamercolorbox}}%
    \vskip0pt%
}

%gets rid of bottom navigation bars
%\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]{}

%gets rid of bottom navigation symbols
%\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}

%gets rid of footer
%will override 'frame number' instruction above
%comment out to revert to previous/default definitions
%\setbeamertemplate{footline}{}

\newcommand{\backupbegin}{
    \newcounter{framenumberappendix}
    \setcounter{framenumberappendix}{\value{framenumber}}
}
\newcommand{\backupend}{
    \addtocounter{framenumberappendix}{-\value{framenumber}}
    \addtocounter{framenumber}{\value{framenumberappendix}} 
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

%\title[GEANT4/EGS5]{GEANT4/EGS5}

\title{Dark photons at SeaQuest}

\author{Sho Uemura}
\institute{Los Alamos National Laboratory}
\date[June 15, 2018]

%\titlegraphic{
%\includegraphics[height=0.1\textheight]{SLAC_Logo}\hspace*{4.75cm}~
%\includegraphics[height=0.1\textheight]{partner_logo_v2}
%}

\begin{document}

%\setcounter{framenumber}{2} 
\begin{frame}
    \titlepage
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{What is the dark photon?}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.6\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item ``Dark sector'' emerging as a picture of dark matter that is compatible with light dark matter, and allows for self-scattering, collisional excitation, annihilation
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Standard Model forces don't couple to the dark sector, dark forces don't couple to Standard Model matter
                    \item ``Portals'' create weak effective couplings between the sectors
                \end{itemize}
            \item Vector portal: dark mediator is a massive $U(1)$ boson (heavy photon)
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Kinetic mixing with the photon $\to$ weak coupling to electric charge
                \end{itemize}
            %\item The mixing can come from different mechanisms: natural scale for one-loop diagrams is $\epsilon\sim 10^{-2}-10^{-4}$, two-loop $\epsilon\sim 10^{-3}-10^{-6}$

        \end{itemize}
        \column{0.4\textwidth}
        \begin{center}
            \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{sm_dark}

            \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{kinetic_mixing}
        \end{center}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Parameter space}
    \begin{columns}
    \column{0.6\textwidth}
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Two relevant parameters: mass $m_{A'}$, coupling strength $\epsilon=\sqrt{\alpha'/\alpha}$
            \begin{itemize}
                \item Coupling strength governs production from, and decay to, Standard Model matter
                \item Favored region is $m_{A'}$ MeV---GeV, $\epsilon>10^{-6}$
            \end{itemize}
        \item Broad search space (few strongly favored regions in either mass or coupling)
            \begin{itemize}
                \item The dark photon is not the dark matter; cosmology is mostly sensitive to $\alpha_D$, the DM$-A'$ coupling
            \end{itemize}
        \item Mass hierarchy: dark photon decays visibly if $m_{A'}<2m_\chi$, invisibly if $m_{A'}>2m_\chi$
            \begin{itemize}
                \item SeaQuest is sensitive to visible decays
            \end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
    %\begin{center}
    %\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{st2_done_1000}
    %\end{center}
    \column{0.4\textwidth}
    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{seaquest_reach}

    %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reach_gardner}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{The SeaQuest facility}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{0.4\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Fixed-target muon spectrometer, Fermilab 120 GeV proton beam
%\item Primary program: Drell-Yan measurements of sea quark distributions
%\begin{itemize}
%\item E906 (unpolarized targets, 2012--2017), E1039 (polarized targets, 2019--2020)
%\end{itemize}
%%\item Measurement of the nucleon sea quark distribution using Drell-Yan% ($q\bar{q}\to \mu^+\mu^-$)
%\item Parasitic searches for dark photons approved 2015 (E1067)
%%\item Thin ($\sim$10\%$\lambda_I$) rotating targets: LH2, LD2, C, Fe, W
%%\item Iron-filled dipole magnet serves as beam dump; second dipole magnet is used for momentum measurement
%%\item Drift chambers for tracking, scintillator hodoscopes for trigger
%\end{itemize}
%%\begin{center}
%%\end{center}
%\column{0.6\textwidth}
%\begin{flushright}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{seaquest_setup}
%\tiny{arXiv:1706.09990}
%\end{flushright}
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Production and signatures at SeaQuest}
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Three dominant production mechanisms: meson decay, proton bremsstrahlung, Drell-Yan
            (yields from arXiv:1804.00661)
            %\begin{itemize}
        \item Prompt $A' \to \mu^+\mu^-$: bump-hunt
        \item Displaced $A' \to \mu^+\mu^-$: background suppressed by vertexing
        \item Displaced $A' \to e^+e^-$: background absorbed in dump
            %\end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
    \begin{columns}
        %\column{0.35\textwidth}
        %\begin{center}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ProductionAprime}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.3\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{meson_decay}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{proton_bremsstrahlung}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{drell-yan}

        \column{0.55\textwidth}
        \begin{flushright}
            \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ProductionAprime}
        \end{flushright}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{darkphoton-BR-1-3000-LOG}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{SeaQuest searches for dark photons}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.55\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
                %\item Prompt dark photons (large $\epsilon$, large $m_{A'}$): look for a mass bump above the smooth Drell-Yan background
            \item Dimuons in main SeaQuest dataset
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Bump-hunt at high mass (ongoing effort)
                \end{itemize}
            \item Dimuon displaced-vertex trigger
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Commissioned 2017
                \end{itemize}
            \item Dielectron trigger
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item EMCal for electron PID (proposals in preparation)
                \end{itemize}
                %\item Non-prompt dark photons (small $\epsilon$): look for dilepton vertices deep inside or after the beam dump
                %\item Non-prompt search requires a new trigger for low-mass displaced vertices, which was commissioned this year
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{dimuon_mass}
        %\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{dimuon_z}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{prompt}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{displaced}
        %\end{center}
        %\column{0.35\textwidth}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{prompt}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{displaced}

        \column{0.45\textwidth}
        \begin{flushright}
            \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{dimuon_mass}
        \end{flushright}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{prompt}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{displaced}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{dimuon_z}
    \end{columns}
    \begin{center}
        %\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{prompt}
        \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{displaced}
    \end{center}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Why SeaQuest?}
    \begin{columns}
    \column{0.6\textwidth}
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Most fixed-target dark photon experiments have thin targets or thick beam dumps (100s of meters)
        \item SeaQuest has:
            \begin{itemize}
                \item Thin dump, just thick enough to absorb beam backgrounds
                \item High beam energy (boosts the $A'$, so $\gamma c\tau$ gets through the dump)
                \item Proton beam: many production channels and wide mass coverage
            \end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
    %\begin{center}
    %\end{center}
    \column{0.4\textwidth}
    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{ProductionAprime}

    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reach_differentchannels}
    \end{columns}
    %\begin{center}
    %\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{displaced}
    %\end{center}
\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{Displaced vertex trigger}
    %\begin{columns}
        %\column{0.65\textwidth}
        %\begin{itemize}
            %\item Two new fine-grained scintillator hodoscopes measure track Y
            %\item Existing station 4 paddles are used for muon ID
            %\item FPGA trigger extrapolates tracks to the beam plane and fires on pairs of tracks with large Z
                %% acceptance: z=400 to 650 cm
                %%\item Extruded scintillator bars detect charged particles, wavelength-shifting fibers collect light and transport it to the SiPMs
                %%\item Station 1: four boxes, 80 1-cm bars each
                %%\item Station 2: four boxes, 50 2-cm bars each
        %\end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
            %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{trigger_sketch}
            %\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{trigger_schematic}
            %%\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{st2_done_1000}
        %\end{center}
        %\column{0.35\textwidth}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{1mhodo_safety}
    %\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{Trigger hodoscopes}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{0.65\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Extruded scintillator bars detect charged particles, wavelength-shifting fibers collect light and transport it to SiPMs
%\item Each station is split into quadrants; active area has a beam gap of $|y|>7.5$ cm but minimal gap in $x$
%\item Station 1: $z=8$ m, 1 cm segmentation, 80 bars/quadrant
%%80 cm long
%\item Station 2: $z=15$ m, 2 cm segmentation, 50 bars/quadrant
%%100 cm long
%%\item Station 1: four boxes, 80 1$\times$1 cm bars each
%%\item Station 2: four boxes, 50 2$\times$2 cm bars each
%\end{itemize}
%\begin{center}
%%\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{st2_done_1000}
%\includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth]{IMG_4732}
%\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{IMG_4793_1000}
%
%\end{center}
%\column{0.35\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{st1_done_1000}
%
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{Readout and services}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{0.65\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Power supplies provide independent control of every SiPM bias voltage
%\item Postage-stamp preamps read out the SiPMs and send signals to discriminators
%\item Discriminators fan out to TDCs (readout) and CAEN V1495 FPGA boards (trigger)
%\end{itemize}
%\begin{center}
%\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{IMG_4794_half}
%\hspace{0.05\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{IMG_4795_half}
%\end{center}
%\column{0.35\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{cal_fibers_1000}
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

%trigger requirements and acceptance
\begin{frame}{Trigger logic}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.6\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item Two levels: identify displaced tracks, trigger on pairs
            \item L1: three-way coincidence within each quadrant
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Identify displaced tracks ($z_0 \in [400,650]$ cm) in each quadrant using roads
                \end{itemize}
            \item L2: two-out-of-four coincidence between opposite-sign quadrants
            \item In 2017, we wired this to NIM2
                %\begin{itemize}
                %\item Require pairs of displaced tracks, opposite sign
                %\item $z_0$ matching possible
                %\end{itemize}
                % acceptance: z=400 to 650 cm
                %\item Extruded scintillator bars detect charged particles, wavelength-shifting fibers collect light and transport it to the SiPMs
                %\item Station 1: four boxes, 80 1-cm bars each
                %\item Station 2: four boxes, 50 2-cm bars each
        \end{itemize}
        \begin{center}
            %\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{trigger_sketch}
            \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{trigger_schematic}
            %\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{st2_done_1000}
        \end{center}
        \column{0.4\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{trigger_roads}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Installation and commissioning}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.5\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item Trigger hodoscopes installed spring 2017
                %\item Detectors and trigger electronics tested and timed in
            \item Displaced vertex trigger rate is $\sim$5\% of the SeaQuest Drell-Yan trigger, acceptable for parasitic running
            \item 5 days of good data taken with the displaced vertex trigger before summer shutdown
            %\item Expect O($10^{18}$) POT over the next two years, parasitic with new SeaQuest polarized target run
                % 8e15 protons on target
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{coincidence_2017-06-16}
        %    \hspace{0.1\textwidth}
        %    \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{triggerrate_ratio}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.25\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{IMG_2459_1000}

        \column{0.25\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{IMG_2539_1000}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{Analysis status and plans}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Alignment and reconstruction: done
%\item Detector efficiency: done
%\item Trigger performance: in progress
%\item Next steps:
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Look for signal
%\item Understand our expected signal: update signal yields using as-built trigger geometry
%\end{itemize}
%\end{itemize}
%\begin{center}
%\hspace{0.1\textwidth}
%\end{center}
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

%\begin{frame}{Detector performance}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{0.65\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item Efficiencies $\sim$95\% excepting $\sim$10\% bad channels
%\item Inefficiency: bar gaps
%\item Bad channels: inconsistent optical coupling (will fix)
%\end{itemize}
%\begin{center}
%\includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth,page=30]{efficiency}
%\end{center}
%\column{0.35\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=4]{efficiency}
%
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=31]{efficiency}
%
%%\column{0.30\textwidth}
%%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=30]{efficiency}
%%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{IMG_2539_1000}
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

%trigger performance: road checking
\begin{frame}{Trigger performance in 2017 data}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
                %\item Check all trigger inputs arrive in time: OK
                %\begin{itemize}
                %\item Top: hit times after delay adjustment (green: St1, blue: St2, red: H4)
                %\end{itemize}
            \item Displaced-vertex trigger is 150 ns late relative to the event (cabling mistake during commissioning)
            \item Damage report: lost all hits in DC0 (120 ns drift time) and $\sim$50\% of hits in other chambers
            \item We can make straight tracks in stations 2--4 and try to assess backgrounds in the non-bend view
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Problem: very bad (and angle-dependent) tracking efficiency
                \end{itemize}
            \item We can look at hodoscope hit information (not in time relative to events that fired the displaced-vertex trigger) to understand trigger backgrounds
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item May allow us to optimize the trigger criteria
                \end{itemize}
                %\item Input delays must be adjusted to compensate for time-of-flight and cable delays
                %\item All quadrant triggers must fire in time with each other, and the final dark photon trigger must have the same latency as the E906 DY trigger
                %\item Middle: time distribution of one quadrant's trigger signal
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{roadcheck}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=5]{withprop}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{TLquad_crop}

        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{h1_aft_inh_nim_02}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Schedule and prospects}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item Updated reach estimates soon
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Realistic trigger geometry and acceptance
                \end{itemize}
            \item Displaced-vertex trigger will be ready to go when beam arrives at SeaQuest
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Bad channels will be fixed, trigger logic will be recommissioned
                \end{itemize}
            \item Possible PID upgrade (using recycled PHENIX EMCal) will add sensitivity to dielectron decay channel and other new physics (SIMPs, iDM)
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %\includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{st2_done_1000}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{e1039_target}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Visible_Aprime_Future}
        \tiny{arXiv:1804.00661}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{EMCal upgrade}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item One PHENIX EMCal sector: $2\times4$ m$^2$ wall of Pb-scintillator shashlyks
            \item Between St-3 and the absorber wall
            \item Simple energy threshold can trigger on non-MIP particles
            \item Track matching enables electron ID (reject $K^0_L\to\pi^\pm e^\mp\nu_e$ mis-ID background)
                %\begin{itemize}
                %\item P
                %\end{itemize}
        \end{itemize}
        \begin{center}
            \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        \end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{phenix_emcal}

        %\column{0.35\textwidth}
        %\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Visible_Aprime_Future}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{EMCal upgrade --- hardware}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item The two best sectors have been transferred (on paper) to LANL
            \item We have the full PHENIX readout system; investigating whether it can be directly reused for SeaQuest
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Time structure (10 MHz vs. 53 MHz) is the main concern
                    \item Alternative: STAR is developing a readout system with the same modules
                \end{itemize}
            \item HV uses LeCroy mainframes, will be loaned by BNL
            \item LV used custom PHENIX supplies which are gone, looking at other options
            \item Monitoring system: fibers and splitters are in place, probably use an LED light source in place of laser
                %\begin{itemize}
                %\item P
                %\end{itemize}
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{phenix_emcal_module}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{phenix_emcal_monitoring}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{EMCal plan}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item EMCal proposal being discussed with Fermilab PAC
            \item Gathering collaborators: theorists, detector groups (PHENIX EMCal, STAR+sPHENIX forward upgrades)
            \item The sectors are ready to be shipped next month to the {D\O} assembly area
            \item Hope to be ready to install during the 2019 summer shutdown
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{phenix_emcal_module}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{phenix_emcal_monitoring}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{EMCal reach}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item SeaQuest with EMCal could access a big chunk of the parameter space
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Plot shows expected reach from other experiments by 2021 (before LHCb run 3)
                \end{itemize}
            \item Lots of interest in the dark sectors community
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item SeaQuest+EMCal note: arXiv:1804.00661 (compare to arXiv:1509.00050 from Gardner+Holt+Tadepalli)
                    \item Working with theorists to converge on expected performance
                \end{itemize}
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_reach}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reach_gardner}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Other DM models: iDM, SIMPs}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item More complicated (``rich'') dark sectors with similar signatures
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item SeaQuest has an advantage over other experiments since it is relatively insensitive to production kinematics
                \end{itemize}
            \item SIMPs (strongly interacting dark matter)
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item arXiv:1801.05805
                \end{itemize}
            \item iDM (inelastic dark matter)
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item arXiv:1804.00661
                \end{itemize}
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reach_simp}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reach_idm}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Beryllium-8 anomaly}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item Anomaly in $p+{^7}\mathrm{Li}\to {^8}\mathrm{Be}^* \to {^8}\mathrm{Be}+e^+e^-$ could be explained by a dark photon-like particle with mass $\sim$17 MeV
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Caveats: a vanilla dark photon is ruled out in this region, some model-building is needed (arXiv:1608.03591)
                \end{itemize}
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{be8_region}

        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{be8_seaquest}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}{Leptophilic scalar}
    \begin{columns}
        \column{0.65\textwidth}
        \begin{itemize}
            \item One possible solution to the muon $g-2$ anomaly: leptophilic scalar (Higgs-like coupling to leptons)
                \begin{itemize}
                    \item Relevant area of the dark photon parameter space has been covered
                \end{itemize}
            \item Radiated by muons inside the beam dump, decays to dielectron
        \end{itemize}
        %\begin{center}
        %    \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{emcal_location}
        %\end{center}
        \column{0.35\textwidth}
        \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{leptophilic_scalar}
    \end{columns}
\end{frame}


% Detector efficiency
% Detector efficiency
% Trigger efficiency?
% EMCal


%\begin{frame}{Fix vertex fit}
%\begin{columns}
%\column{0.6\textwidth}
%\begin{itemize}
%\item The resolution of the reconstructed mass should be independent of Z but is worse for displaced vertices.
%\end{itemize}
%\begin{center}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{mass_shift_40}
%\end{center}
%\column{0.4\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[width=\textwidth,page=4]{acceptance_40}
%\end{columns}
%\end{frame}

\end{document}